Do you remember the Millennium Celebrations? Y2K? Was that really five years ago? What were you doing five years ago... most likely something different from what you're doing today. As we now enter the second half of this decade, my question to you is - what will you be doing in five years time? Where will you be in 2010? If this is half time, how has the first half gone for you, and what do you plan to change your approach in the second half?

As a nerdy 13 year old, my claim to fame was being in the school chess club. I had been taught that being brainy was good, and the most brainy game to play was chess. Or so I thought until one chess-playing afternoon, after a particularly grueling exam, I posed a question to my chess buddies: "If chess is so smart, why is the leader the weakest piece?"

Everyone stared at the king for a moment, and then started to try and outdo each other with the ways in which chess was so different from the intellectual competition we were facing at school: "Why do we sometimes win by sacrificing the strongest pieces?", "Why does the game end not because the winning player has all the options, but because the losing player has run out of options?", "Why is the best player not the one who sees what's there, but sees what's next?", "How does a game that looks so black and white remain so grey?"

I forgot about our conversation for years, while we continued to get our grades, pass our exams, and fight for our college places. We put our heads down and worked at being the smartest, the cleverest, the strongest. In fact, it was 10 years later before I was reminded of that conversation. I had left university and started my entrepreneurial career. Being a fast mover, I had already achieved two business failures and was heading for my third when a wealthy property developer, Michael Braunstein, gave me a word of advice: "The reason you won't be successful is because you still think you're smart." Huh? I asked him to elaborate. He said: "You think you're smart, so you try and do everything yourself. As for me, I know I'm stupid, so I have no choice but to hire smart people like you to do everything for me."

In academic circles, everyone competes to be the smartest. In entrepreneurial circles, it's quite the opposite. When I graduated from Cambridge I was conditioned to think I was special. It took me years to realize that this thought was the biggest thing stopping my entrepreneurial success.

Entrepreneurs do not think they're special: Their customers are special, their team is special. As long as I was the strongest piece, I wasn't even playing the game.

From that day forward my thinking changed. When I had a bright new idea, instead of thinking "I've had a bright new idea" I would think "Who would already have had this idea?" and I would make the effort to find them and learn from them. When something needed to be done, instead of asking "What do I need to do?" I would ask "Who can do this?". Instead of thinking I knew, I'd look for who knew more. I started to spend more time valuing the strength of those around me and the moves they made.

As the American Industrialist, Andrew Carnegie said "No man will make a great leader who wants to do it all himself or get all the credit for doing it".

When we choose to make ourselves the weakest in the team - by surrounding ourselves with others who are each superior in their own strengths - we also realize the game is not to try and be successful, but to make others successful. If you want to find a billionaire, look for a large group of millionaires and you'll find the billionaire in the middle. Focus on success and it will elude you. Focus on the success of others and the favour is soon returned. There's a saying: "It's lonely at the top". Of course it isn't if you've made sure everyone else gets there first. In my late twenties, as I found myself increasingly surrounded by strong teams that allowed me to step back and view the game, I realized the extra time allowed me to look further ahead for the benefit of everyone. Moving less meant seeing more. It reminded me of another of our 13 year old comments: "Why is the best player not the one who sees what's there, but sees what's next?".

We are five years into this new millennium. How will you play the game in the next five years? As an academic or an entrepreneur? What resources will you access? As their primary resource, academics use their knowledge, while entrepreneurs use their network. Academics need to know in order to do. Entrepreneurs need to do in order to know. Academics study the past, while entrepreneurs study the future. In these next five years, will you be choosing to live in the past, or in the future?

Back at school, we were all taught to compete against each other and demonstrate just how smart we were on our own. Demonstrating our smartness was the key to our survival. Ten years later, I was being told that this winning formula was now a losing formula. How should I now reconcile this? Did I really need to choose now between book smart and street smart? Did I need to choose between academic or entrepreneur? Was it really that black & white?

I thought back to chess. No one piece can win the game on its own. We're all a part of each other's game, so we win or lose together. I thought about Michael Braunstein's words ""The reason you won't be successful is because you still think you're smart." Hmm.. not because I was smart, but because I still thought I was smart. Some people think they know. Some know they don't know. This time the answer was black and white: The smart entrepreneurs have the certainty to know and - at the same time - they have the humility to know they don't know.

In December, the East Asia Summit takes place in Malaysia: The very first time that all the major countries in Asia Pacific have met together as one economic concern. Why is this so significant and how will this affect you in the next five years?

The countries meeting are: Australia, New Zealand, China, India, Japan, the Republic of Korea and the 10 members of ASEAN -- Singapore, Malaysia, Thailand, Myanmar, Philippines, Indonesia, Cambodia, Laos, Vietnam and Brunei.

What are the eventual objectives of the group? Japan's Foreign Minister Taro Aso has said "Japan believes we should bring into being the East Asia Free Trade Area and the East Asia Investment Area in order to move us even one step closer to regional economic integration." This trade integration was the starting point that eventually created the European Union. The combined GDP of these countries now stands at over US$10 trillion, compared to just over US$11 trillion for the European Union. Within two years, this group will overtake the EU as an economic group. With the US GDP at US$13 trillion, at current growth rates this group will overtake the US within five years. Where will you be in five years? In five years Asia Pacific will have become the largest economic powerhouse in the World. In 2004, over US$200 billion of investment dollars flowed into this region. China alone registered a record investment inflow of US$55 billion (compared to US$47 billion in 2003), and Singapore and Hong Kong recorded a further US$50 billion inflow. This compares to an all-time-high outflow from the US of US$252 billion (compared to US$141 billion in 2003).

Investment dollars are being sucked into the region at a record rate of over US$600 million a day. Is this relevant to you? We are in the middle of the greatest transfer of wealth in the history of this planet. In 1900, the world's richest came from Europe. In 2000, the world's richest came from the United States. It is not going to be 100 years for the world's richest to come from Asia.

In five years the world will have undergone a fundamental and historic shift. Where will you be in five years? As with all rising tides, where we are may be a greater determining factor to our success than who we are.

AND FINALLY...

When we moved to Bali four months ago Renate, my wonderful wife, had a goal of finding a CT Scanner so that she could finish the medical Masters Degree she was taking. After finding that there were only two on the island (both in the larger hospitals and both out-of-bounds to foreigners) she finally gave up the search and the prospect of finishing her masters. Giving up that goal was a very big and difficult decision, but if there was no CT scanner, then there was no CT scanner.

On the Friday in October when she gave up her goal, we were at a dinner with friends when someone asked Renate "So what are you going to do in Bali?" It was a sore point, and Renate responded "I have no idea. But I'd like to make a difference here." Someone else suggested "With your expertise, you should contact John Fawcett. He lives just down the road from you."

It turned out that John Fawcett was one of the more famous character in Bali. Having dedicated himself to giving sight to the blind in Bali, in the last fifteen years he has given 22,500 Balinese a life of sight through cataract surgery, corneal grafting and mobile eye clinics. The very next day, Renate visited John.

She waited for him in his room while he was busy with patients, and she began to read the stories on his office wall and look at the photos of the many children and families whose lives he had transformed. As she stood there - looking and reading - an enormous sense of purpose overcame her and she suddenly saw why she was in Bali. It was to meet John. By the time John came in to meet her, she had made a commitment to help him in any way possible. She told him so, and he immediately took to her.

He began to show her around. He began to tell her about his need for more people, for more time. He explained how he gets many donations of goods and even machinery - some of which he had no expertise to use. He pointed out one piece of machinery that had been donated all the way from Australia. Renate just looked at the machine and her jaw dropped...

It was a CT scanner.

Sometimes, to reach our goals, the best thing to do is to let them go - so they have a chance to find us. Last Saturday Renate took me to meet John, and to see his office. On his wall, next to photos of many people who he had given vision to, he had a quote about vision that was meant for you and me:

Belief, courage, action

-Roger Hamilton

XL Results Foundation Pte Ltd
30 Robinson Road
#11-01 Robinson Towers
Tel: 65-63723383
Fax: 65-63231131
Website: www.resultsfoundation.com

Roger Hamilton

Roger Hamilton is Asia’ Leading Wealth Consultant. In the last year he has shared powerful wealth creation principles with over 30,000 people in more than 150 conferences, seminars and workshops.

After graduating from Trinity College, Cambridge, in Architecture, Roger decided to become a better architect, which he interpreted as building enterprises, teams, value and wealth, rather than apartment blocks and shopping malls.

Roger became a serial entrepreneur, failing many times before becoming a millionaire in his late twenties and retiring at the age of thirty. Now, in his retirement he has committed himself to a vision of World Wide Wealth: Studying and teaching the concept of making money to give away.

Now, he owns seven businesses in publishing, design, property, event management, franchising, training and resort management. He currently resides in Bali, Indonesia, and conducts seminars and coaching throughout Asia.

He is the Chairman of XL Results Foundation, Asia’s largest entrepreneur network. He is also the publisher of XL Magazine, Asia’s first magazine dedicated to Social Enteprise

For recent press articles, and Roger’s schedule, visit our web site